Lately, I’ve found myself reflecting on what it really means to be a Black designer. Not just in the portfolio sense, but as a lived identity that colours how you notice things, question things, and design things that others might overlook entirely. Being Black in this industry often feels like being bilingual: fluent in the official design language… while also holding a second, deeper language shaped by lived experience, cultural memory, and the subtle codes you inherit from your community.
This hit me sharply after reading the Anthropology of the Black Experience in Design. It’s one of those texts that doesn’t just inform you; it lingers. It asks you to sit with the uncomfortable truth that design—at least the version that dominates the “canon”—has been shaped disproportionately by a narrow slice of the world. European. White. Male. A greatest-hits playlist on repeat.
When that’s the default standard of “good design,” everything else gets measured against it. Including us. Including our communities. Including people whose lives and realities sit entirely outside those inherited assumptions.
And this is exactly why so many mainstream services fail—sometimes quietly, sometimes catastrophically—for users who don’t fit the mould they were designed around. These services weren’t created with us, or anywhere near us. You can tell. You can feel it. They’re efficient on paper and alienating in practice.
But here’s what the dominant canon never accounted for: the depth, richness, ingenuity, humour, cultural intelligence, and resilience that Black designers bring to this work. We aren’t simply “diversifying the field.” We are expanding its imagination.
The SDinGov conference wake-up call
A recent moment really crystallised this for me.
I attended the SDinGov conference—a gathering of around 400 designers shaping public services across the country. These are the people designing tools, systems, and infrastructures that directly impact how people live, learn, heal, access support, and navigate government.
Out of roughly 400 people, only a small, countable handful were Black—including me and my team.
Four hundred designers building services for a nation that is deeply, visibly multicultural… and the room looked nothing like the people it was designing for.
It wasn’t simply a “diversity issue.” It was a design-quality issue. An equity issue. A systems-integrity issue. Because when the people shaping public systems lack the lived insight to understand the full spectrum of human experience, their work inevitably reflects those blind spots.
It’s not that these designers are incapable or ill-intentioned. It’s that no amount of desktop research can replace the cultural intelligence that comes from lived experience.
